Brownian Motion

Brownian motion (equivalently, the Wiener process) is a continuous-time stochastic process taking values in with the following defining properties:

  1. almost surely.
  2. Independent increments. For any times , the increments are mutually independent.
  3. Gaussian increments. For , .
  4. Continuous paths. The map is continuous almost surely.

These four axioms determine the process up to indistinguishability. The mean function is and the covariance function is

The joint law of any finite collection is multivariate Gaussian with mean zero and covariance matrix . Brownian motion is therefore a Gaussian process with kernel , the canonical non-stationary kernel.

Despite having continuous sample paths, Brownian motion is nowhere differentiable almost surely. Its paths are Hölder continuous of every order and have infinite total variation on every interval, but finite quadratic variation: on the sum converges to in probability as the mesh of the partition goes to zero.

Brownian motion is the continuous-time limit of a symmetric random walk: if with , then converges in distribution to as (Donsker’s invariance principle).

Prerequisites

Intuition

Brownian motion is the mathematical idealization of a particle jostled by infinitely many infinitesimally small independent shocks per unit time. At the macroscopic scale the particle’s position is continuous, but zooming in reveals that the trajectory is rougher than any smooth curve: it fluctuates on every time scale. The defining tension is that the increments are independent and centered (so the process has no drift and no memory), yet their accumulated variance grows linearly with time (), producing paths that wander arbitrarily far from the origin.

The covariance is the signature that makes BM a tractable Gaussian process. Intuitively, and share exactly the increments accumulated in their common past ; the increments after are independent and contribute nothing to the covariance. This gives the process its Markov property: the future after time depends on the past only through , because is independent of by the independent-increments axiom.

Properties

(Independent Increments) Disjoint-time increments are mutually independent.

For any , the random variables are independent. This is the single most important structural property: it reduces joint probabilities over times to products of univariate Gaussians over the gaps , and it gives the process its Markov property and its martingale property simultaneously.

(Gaussian Increments) for .

The distribution of an increment depends only on the length of the time interval, not on its position. This makes the process stationary in increments (sometimes called “homogeneous increments”) even though the process itself is non-stationary: grows with . The standard deviation of the increment is , which is why BM is Hölder- continuous for every but not .

(Covariance Function) .

Write and decompose . Since is independent of by the independent-increments axiom, . The symmetric case gives by the same argument. This kernel is positive semi-definite but non-stationary: it does not depend only on . The Gram matrix for any finite collection of times is the covariance matrix of the joint law of .

(Markov Property) given has the same distribution as given alone.

The independent-increments axiom gives , so conditioning on the whole past is no more informative than conditioning on the present. This makes BM a continuous-time Markov process on , with transition density

the Gaussian kernel of variance . The density satisfies the heat equation , so BM is the stochastic process associated with Brownian diffusion.

(Martingale Property) is a martingale with respect to its own filtration.

, using independence of the increment from and the zero-mean property. Together with being a martingale and being a martingale for every , these are the standard martingales used in stochastic calculus.

(Non-Differentiability) Sample paths are continuous but nowhere differentiable almost surely.

Formally: with probability one, there is no at which the limit exists. The heuristic is that the increment has standard deviation , so has standard deviation , which blows up as . Paths are Hölder continuous of every order but not . This is why classical calculus fails on BM paths and Itô calculus is needed: integrals cannot be defined pathwise as Riemann-Stieltjes integrals.

(Quadratic Variation) in probability as the partition mesh .

Although the total variation is infinite on every interval, the sum of squared increments converges to the length of the interval. Informally, ”.” This replaces the usual calculus rule at second order and is the reason the Itô chain rule for carries the extra term :

(Time Inversion and Self-Similarity) is itself a Brownian motion for every ; extended to at is another BM.

Scaling time by and space by leaves the law invariant, and this self-similarity is what makes BM a fractal. Time inversion exchanges the behavior near with the behavior near , which is useful for deducing long-time asymptotics from short-time ones and vice versa.

(Reflection Principle) For , .

The running maximum of BM on has the distribution of . The argument: every path that exceeds at some point before is equally likely (by reflection about level after the hitting time) to end up above or below at time . This gives the explicit formula

and related closed forms for the distributions of first hitting times, last exit times, and the joint density of .

(Construction via Donsker’s Theorem) BM is the scaling limit of simple symmetric random walks.

Let be i.i.d. with mean and variance , and set . The rescaled process

converges in distribution (as a process on ) to standard Brownian motion as . This gives a constructive proof that BM exists and justifies the heuristic that BM is “continuous random walk.”

Examples

Derivation

Goal. Derive the covariance function directly from the four defining axioms.

For , decompose

Both terms have mean zero, so .

By the independent-increments axiom, is independent of , so the cross term factors: .

By the Gaussian-increments axiom, , so . Combining,

The case is symmetric, so for all .

For the joint law of , apply the same decomposition recursively. Writing and , the independence and Gaussianity of increments give . Since is a linear function of , it is jointly Gaussian with mean zero, and its covariance matrix is by the pairwise calculation above. This jointly-Gaussian property is exactly what makes BM a Gaussian process.

See Also